Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory61.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 13:25
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 46.7
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 141
48% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 574
52% 435 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 105
Parallax 108
92% 109 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 100
Splatting 93.9
87% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,000
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,142
340% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 44
142% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 464
325% 414 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
27GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 99 100 102 97 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 149
Write 113
Mixed 136
SusWrite 95.9
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 22.2
76% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 111
88% 123 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 61%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
80GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 101 101 99 106 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 163
Write 112
Mixed 130
SusWrite 99.9
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 20.7
72% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 88.1
73% 104 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$79
255GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1536 894 893 889 891 891 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 1787
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 999
363% 1,619 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 46.1
150% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 500
358% 463 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 211%
Great: 346%
USB Flash Memory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.7 4 4 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Read 33.5
Write 10.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.8
12% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 12.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,839
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback