Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 00:09
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 118
53% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B84) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.04% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 13
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
570GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 69 98 89 116 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 139
Mixed 72
SusWrite 83.9
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback