Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 23:41
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 678
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 29.6
15% 20.7 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 15.7
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 35 28 30 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 494
Write 17.3
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 31.7
33% 156 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 13.1
59% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 56.5
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 0.4
8% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
901GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 167 172 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 162
Mixed 107
SusWrite 171
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback