Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GL62 7RDX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 197
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 561
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 32.7
26% 32.1 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 35
Splatting 21.3
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3128GG5 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 192 195 190 197 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 495
Write 198
Mixed 220
SusWrite 194
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 35.8
142% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 130
131% 214 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 125 131 131 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67% Good
Read 107
Write 112
Mixed 70
SusWrite 126
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FR 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback