Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GL62 7RDX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 01:56
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 211
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 493
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.3
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3128GG5 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 149 151 173 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66% Good
Read 430
Write 0.5
Mixed 250
SusWrite 146
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 15
101% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 82.9
105% 189 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FR 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback