Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-710
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 22:13
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 202
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 418
55% 415 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 310
Sapphire(174B D335) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.3001.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 2.6
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0105A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 395 394 387 210 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 512
Write 382
Mixed 396
SusWrite 313
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 1.6
118% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 2.3
58% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
585GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 144
Mixed 72.8
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-710 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback