Today's hottest deals

Asus A55BM-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A55BM-K  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 100
53% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 85.8
8-Core 92.6
12% 89.2 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 310
Sapphire(174B D335) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.87
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 2.47
2% 2.74 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 63 104 177 183 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 185
Write 182
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 124
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55BM-K Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback