Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 13:17
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 160
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 328
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 31.2
25% 33.1 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 0.3
16% 22.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
723GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU002E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 112 131 120 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 119
Write 128
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 114
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 859B CT4G4SFS824A.C8FBD2 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 7,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback