Today's hottest deals

Asus GL503VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL503VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL503VD
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 05:20
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 184
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 351
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1BB0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 5.8
0% 12.2 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 49 38 34 42 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 440
Write 120
Mixed 209
SusWrite 47.3
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 23.9
86% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 208
169% 242 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
718GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 86 86 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 81.8
Write 69.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 86.2
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL503VD Builds (Compare 1,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL503VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback