Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82C3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82C3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 109
42% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 119
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend(17AA 3FB4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.3
2% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 446 386 362 357 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 565
Write 497
Mixed 525
SusWrite 398
112% 496 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 37.3
130% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 170
129% 177 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 218%
WD My Passport 0820 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 99 98 99 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 101
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 97.7
116% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 20%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C3 Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback