Today's hottest deals

Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 13:31
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 62.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
76% 143 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 939
83% 705 Pts
64-Core 2,357
146% 2,357 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 62.2
52% 65 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 53.9
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$69
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,563
Write 2,282
Mixed 1,621
479% 2,155 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 87.5
293% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 699
DQ Mixed 773
591% 805 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$69
132GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,586
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,611
479% 2,159 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 87.3
296% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 844
641% 870 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2507 2516 2516 2518 2517 2515 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,472
Write 2,508
Mixed 2,360
SusWrite 2,515
556% 2,464 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 87.4
281% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 814
604% 806 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 376%
Great: 508%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
225GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 72 73 72 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 83.9
Write 56.7
Mixed 55
SusWrite 70.7
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 62%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.2 7.9 7.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 12
Write 4.3
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 7.7
9% 7.43 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 58.5
MC Mixed 51
155% 54.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback