Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa X2610G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa X2610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Extensa X2610G
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime24.4 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 16:17
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3700
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 48
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 38.6
25% 36 Pts
4-Core 52.7
8-Core 54.8
7% 53.8 Pts
64-Core 81
5% 81 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 1064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 47 38 31 74 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 57.7
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 53.4
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 88%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.3
5% 4.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa X2610G Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa X2610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback