Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 20:06
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 100
50% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 262
29% 228 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3121) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 23.1
19% 24.4 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 17.4
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 41 45 44 43 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 47.6
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 44.2
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 9905403-011.A02LF 9905471-001.A01LF 9905403-011.A02LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback