Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BA
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 13:39
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$79
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 171
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 331
42% 321 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 85E9) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.6% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 38.3
22% 32.2 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 30.6
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 98 68 53 26 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 476
Write 400
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 92.9
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
84GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 79 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 80
Write 91.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 81.6
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 9905403-011.A02LF 9905471-001.A01LF 9905403-011.A02LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 16.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback