Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM IN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM IN  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 12:21
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$131
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 77.4
42% 63 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 154
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4730
Asus(1043 3001) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 1.8
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 117 109 115 111 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 243
Write 222
Mixed 219
SusWrite 112
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 40.1
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.9
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 48.3
39% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
512GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 118 115 117 116 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM IN Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback