Today's hottest deals

MSI P45-C51 (MS-7519)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7519
MotherboardMSI P45-C51 (MS-7519)  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 22:58
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$131
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 79.9
44% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 158
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
POV(1ACC 900C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7.53% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 4.1
9% 9.23 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 4.5
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$69
515GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 61 90 95 62 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 97
Write 101
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 79.1
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 63%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21.1
Mixed 4.2
10% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P45-C51 (MS-7519) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI P45-C51 (MS-7519)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback