Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110706
Uptime27.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 15:52
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 80.9
40% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 81.5
8-Core 80.5
11% 81 Pts
64-Core 77.6
5% 77.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.9
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 191 197 182 193 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.8% Average
Read 206
Write 205
Mixed 183
SusWrite 189
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 24.4
85% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 46.2
38% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 133%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
7GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 12.8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 13.3
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 7%
ST1500LM 012-1R817G 1.5TB
164GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 42.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 42.4
71% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M LE Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback