Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,219
107% 909 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 137
Parallax 140
121% 142 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 142
Splatting 109
115% 145 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 677 675 670 675 677 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,509
SusWrite 718
396% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 100
351% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,767
DQ Write 1,592
DQ Mixed 1,617
1,230% 1,659 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 328%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
217GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,769
Write 8,923
Mixed 9,047
2,064% 9,246 MB/s
4K Read 856
4K Write 518
4K Mixed 280
1,930% 551 MB/s
DQ Read 2,410
DQ Write 1,975
DQ Mixed 2,025
1,562% 2,136 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 185 184 187 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 141
Write 152
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 185
91% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 110%
ST1500LM 012-1R817G 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 123 125 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50% Average
Read 84.3
Write 133
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 125
154% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 29
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 27,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback