Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac14,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac14,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-031B6874CF7F642A
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 09:19
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570R
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 142
54% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 260
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V1 Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Apple(106B 0122) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 12.8
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 1TB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 45 47 51 47 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 58.4
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 48.6
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343531533641465238412D50422020 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,1 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback