Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac14,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac14,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-031B6874CF7F642A
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200412
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 09:38
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570R
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 170
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 334
41% 315 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V1 Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Apple(106B 0122) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 7.97
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 0.09
6% 5.38 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 4.63
Splatting 15.3
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 1TB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 46 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 57.2
Write 58.3
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 45.4
33% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 30.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,1 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback