Today's hottest deals

Samsung 930XDB/931XDB/930XDY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 930XDB/931XDB/930XDY  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP930XDB-KH1DE
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 09:51
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 260
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 472
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C854) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 24.4
16% 23.3 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 16.4
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,182
Write 1026
Mixed 1050
242% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 81.2
279% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 745
532% 685 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 196%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
54GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 59 60 61 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 105%
SDXC Card 64GB
34GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.2 9.2 9.4 10 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 9.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 7.4
11% 9.53 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
104% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 41%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 64GB
4GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.9 3.8 5.1 5.7 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Read 6.9
Write 7.7
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 4.9
10% 7.05 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung U6E3S4AA-MGCR 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 37.6
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 11.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930XDB/931XDB/930XDY Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 930XDB/931XDB/930XDY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback