Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-511

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-511  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Sake_TL
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 00:49
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 253
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 616
66% 525 Pts
64-Core 605
38% 605 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1545) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 24.2
16% 21.4 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 16.9
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,017
Write 2,579
Mixed 2,073
568% 2,556 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 76.3
269% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 788
625% 856 MB/s
Poor: 202% Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung U6E3S4AA-MGCR 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 38.4
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 16.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 4% 24 70 58 60 14" 1296 759 AUODA91
Typical Swift SF314-511 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback