PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79-1356 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180424 |
Uptime | 10.9 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '22 at 13:30 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2450 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8566) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
BR 480GB 480GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0328A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 171 120 5.6 67 63 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
266GB free
Firmware: ST6OA38G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 81 79 81 81 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2450 0IntelBench 64%, 156 samples | 4x |
Xeon E5-2470 0IntelBench 69%, 243 samples | 1x |
Xeon E5-2430 0IntelBench 59%, 115 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 1x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $198 |