Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Huananzhi X79 PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '20 at 12:15
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 123 64% 102 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 122 16% 123 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.4% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 104 Parallax 106 82% 103 fps	MRender 93.7 Gravity 97.1 Splatting 95.3 78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$62 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 615 398 393 352 260 284 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 2,296 Write 1,756 Mixed 1,326 SusWrite 384 320% 1,441 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 65 210% 69.2 MB/s	DQ Read 597 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 495 364% 484 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 195GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 146 Write 130 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 110 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 628GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 28.3 Write 25.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 27.8 37% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 165% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GB 415 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 13.1 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 10.4 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 PLUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 PLUS

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	5x
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	1x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
Blue 3D 500GBWD $73Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	2x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	1x
SSD 120GBEagetBench 54%, 29 samples	1x

RAM
Skill F3-12800CL9-4 Skill F3-10666CL9-4 AMD AE34G1609U2 Skill F3-12800CL9-4 16GBGBench 86%, 5 samples	2x
M393B2G70BH0- 3x16GBSamsungBench 55%, 16 samples	1x
M393B1G70QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 183 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $827

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350