Today's hottest deals

Insys GW1-W149

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemInsys GW1-W149  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 18:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 168
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 308
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 5.6
5% 4.63 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 12.5
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S500 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210324a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 337 376 365 365 340 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 386
Mixed 354
SusWrite 346
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 37.8
147% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 183
149% 207 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 12.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 14.8
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GW1-W149 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Insys GW1-W149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback