Today's hottest deals

Chuwi CoreBook XPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemChuwi CoreBook XPro  (all builds)
MotherboardEmdoor CM918_SODIMM
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210730
Uptime25.6 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 16:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 131
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 328
37% 290 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9219
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 6
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 483 509 505 489 516 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 661
Write 808
Mixed 717
SusWrite 516
153% 676 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 40.2
132% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 706
532% 718 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 131%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 10.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CoreBook XPro Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi CoreBook XPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback