Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L505D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite L505D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 12:51
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II M300
Socket S1G3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 58.5
34% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 58.6
8% 57.8 Pts
64-Core 58.7
4% 58.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon 4100
Toshiba(1179 FF1F) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.8
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 169 199 196 199 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 251
Write 193
Mixed 217
SusWrite 182
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 11.3
49% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 57.1
59% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 100%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
98GB free, PID 1337
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 27 27 27 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 26.9
Mixed 14
SusWrite 25.9
31% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T2864EH3-CF7 M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 3GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L505D Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L505D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback