Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 209
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 408
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 14.3
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 249 18 31 32 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 203
Write 97.1
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 103
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 26.7
88% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 101
106% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 102%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
372GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 112 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 125
Write 106
Mixed 68
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 77%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
181GB free, PID 1337
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 77 77 76 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
Read 49.1
Write 97.9
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 76.3
98% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
204% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback