Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi X79-8D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79-8D  (all builds)
Memory122.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 42.9
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 130
44% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 530
47% 396 Pts
64-Core 2,366
146% 2,366 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3E56) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 8.1
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 512GB 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2101XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 867 281 166 189 187 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,481
Write 1,188
Mixed 969
SusWrite 304
219% 985 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 21.4
121% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 342
256% 340 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 128%
Great: 233%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 230 234 231 234 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 210
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 232
133% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 123%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0- 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.6
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-8D Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-8D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback