Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.6  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.6
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201005
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 18:48
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 501
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8535) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.4% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 61
Parallax 51.6
45% 56.1 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 47.9
42% 52.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 91 90 87 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 790
Write 106
Mixed 137
SusWrite 90.8
60% 281 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 34.7
140% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 158
121% 168 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 169%
BR 512GB 512GB
230GB free
Firmware: HPS2227O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 335 22 46 369 450 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 550
Write 22.9
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 252
45% 209 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
59% 13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 233%
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB
112GB free
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 177 179 179 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 407
Write 150
Mixed 153
SusWrite 176
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 12.5
84% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 78.2
84% 138 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0ED
Typical ABRA A5 V16.6 Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback