Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TK11BZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard EasyNote TK11BZ  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TK11BZ
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 21:45
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 36.6
26% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 36.6
8-Core 36.8
5% 36.7 Pts
64-Core 37
2% 37 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 202 203 202 201 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 221
Write 188
Mixed 202
SusWrite 202
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 16.2
63% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 88.2
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 88.2
63% 82 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 16 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 20.9
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 19.9
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3
204% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TK11BZ Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TK11BZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback