Today's hottest deals

Asus E35M1-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus E35M1-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 13:34
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 16.4
2-Core 22.5
28% 34.9 Pts
4-Core 34.4
8-Core 31.7
4% 33.1 Pts
64-Core 31.4
2% 31.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Asus(1043 84A5) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 240GB SATA SSD 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0819A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 72 83 82 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 203
Write 169
Mixed 185
SusWrite 79
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 8.8
40% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 56.1
DQ Mixed 15.6
19% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 95%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 70 81 81 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 74.6
Write 67.5
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 77.7
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3B4G1C1600L9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 3.2
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E35M1-M PRO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus E35M1-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback