PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151005 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '22 at 14:40 |
Run Duration | 234 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 215 222 219 224 223 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
200GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 219 223 224 226 225 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
182GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 108 111 117 117 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
107GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 115 109 128 97 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 6.7 7 6.6 6.4 6.9 MB/s
|
2.75%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1.5TB
134GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
ST9320423AS 320GB
24GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 22 22 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 103x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 45x |
FX-4300AMD $52Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 44x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $91Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 37x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $174 |