Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 163
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 355
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 14.3
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-256GB 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 189 29 32 7.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 200
Write 191
Mixed 168
SusWrite 104
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 9.2
53% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 11.1
19% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 89%
ST9320423AS 320GB
277GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 21.2
Mixed 21
SusWrite 24.4
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-011.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 9905471-009.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 5% 110 64 50 60 20" 1600 900 DELF030 DELL IN2020M
Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $434
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback