Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro3,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20080229
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 11:51
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 89.9
44% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 359
32% 270 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-XT
Apple(106B 00A6) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDS3STD120GB 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,497
Write 29
Mixed 59.6
110% 529 MB/s
4K Read 228
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.3
352% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 77%
Maxtor 6Y160M0 160GB-$117
148GB free
Firmware: YAR511W0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 52.8
Write 58.8
Mixed 43
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 33%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
765GB free
Firmware: GK0BA96A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.2
Write 84.3
Mixed 48.7
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
592GB free
Firmware: GK0BA96A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,519
Write 22.3
Mixed 45.3
380% 529 MB/s
4K Read 225
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
9,626% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 10.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 24%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback