Today's hottest deals

Asrock P45TurboTwins2000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock P45TurboTwins2000  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 19:27
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 53.9
38% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 102
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 838A) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.38
4% 5.15 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 3.61
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$33
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 75 61 87 97 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 75.3
Write 92
Mixed 48
SusWrite 81.1
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 70%
Maxtor 6Y160M0 160GB-$117
149GB free
Firmware: YAR511W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 56 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 57.8
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 56.5
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P45TurboTwins2000 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P45TurboTwins2000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback