Today's hottest deals

Asus P5ND2-SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5ND2-SLI  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 17:39
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 29.6
32% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 28.4
4% 28.2 Pts
64-Core 30.3
2% 30.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 26 22 28 22 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 14.8
Write 12.3
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 22.1
12% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 30%
Samsung SP1203N 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: TL100-24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 30 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 31
Mixed 20
SusWrite 30.3
20% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5ND2-SLI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5ND2-SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback