Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 01:34
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 111
52% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 160
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 844D) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 21.2
13% 20.2 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 15.8
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP1203N 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TL100-31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 15 20 24 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Read 14
Write 25.2
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 17.4
13% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
112GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 80 93 95 97 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 91.4
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 92.3
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF RZX-D3D10M1600B-8G 12GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback