Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 16:36
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 93.4
50% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 97.4
8-Core 95.8
13% 96.6 Pts
64-Core 98.2
6% 98.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Zotac(19DA 7103) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 4.2
9% 9.53 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 4.7
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 46 53 30 54 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 10.3
Write 12.9
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 46
15% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 37%
HUAWEI SD Storage 64GB
18GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6.9
Write 4
Mixed 6.5
7% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
102% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback