Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '18 at 10:32
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 198
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 540
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 77
65% 80.4 fps
MRender 79
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 67.2
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 10 10 11 10 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
920GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128
186GB free
Firmware: 3.AHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 36%
HUAWEI SD Storage 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.3 6.3 6.5 6.4 6.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Read 7
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 6.1
9% 6.53 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.9
126% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $157

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback