Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A78M Pro3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M Pro3+  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140909
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 74.2
39% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 132
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 68.8
61% 72.8 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 68.5
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 46 78 123 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 156
Write 150
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 76.2
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 Vulcan-1600 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M Pro3+ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M Pro3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback