Today's hottest deals

Asus F2A55-M LK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M LK  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 10:17
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 223
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$160
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 75 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 87.5
Write 81.8
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 73.5
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 65%
WD Re 2TB-$30
430GB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 91.8
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 93.1
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M LK Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback