Today's hottest deals

Seneca PRO905937

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSeneca PRO905937  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Q370M-C
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190523
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 21:28
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 957
89% 740 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.31
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 28.8
25% 30.2 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 26.4
23% 28 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 273 265 263 242 248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 326
Mixed 278
SusWrite 254
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 36.6
128% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 248
214% 318 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5743-031.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 28.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 26.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO905937 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Seneca PRO905937

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback