Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory18.8 GB free of 22.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 20:35
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5647
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 144
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 589
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1500
Nvidia(10DE 032C) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.2
2% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 94 82 43 48 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 29.8
Write 32
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 68.5
28% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.5 4.9 8.2 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 9.3
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 5.3
14% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
44% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 28%
Generic External 1TB
538GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 19 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 27.3
Write 24.5
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 20.2
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:04 CB DDR3 1600 ID:04 CB DDR3 1600 ID:80 CE M378B1G73EB0-YK0 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 56GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 8192, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback