Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80B5
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170428
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 17:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 82.9
40% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 131
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 80B5) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 7.72
0% 5.39 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 5.77
Splatting 7.83
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 89 88 88 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 89.7
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Generic External 1TB
818GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 28.8
Write 22.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 25.6
33% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
202% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 8.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 9,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback