Today's hottest deals

Quanta TW9/SW9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQuanta TW9/SW9  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 18:30
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 114
57% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 203
24% 188 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Quanta(152D 0831) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 3.77 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ002M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 49 57 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 68.6
Write 72.6
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 57.8
40% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GMB20028SOX8271066 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 7% 30 15 4 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO22EC
Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Quanta TW9/SW9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback