Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate 5742

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate 5742  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate 5742
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101108
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 08:44
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 120
47% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 154
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0487) 763MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 33 29 36 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 11
Write 45.3
Mixed 1
SusWrite 35.4
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 2.5
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate 5742 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate 5742

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback