Today's hottest deals

Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 38.4
29% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 69.5
8-Core 100
11% 84.8 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
587GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 480 480 478 472 480 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
8GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.7 7.5 7.3 7.7 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Read 12
Write 10.2
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 7.4
14% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
27% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 SEC314B
Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback