Today's hottest deals

Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 382
41% 325 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.3000
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.53
2% 2.46 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.22
3% 3.31 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
666GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 72 97 100 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 104
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 94.2
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback