Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30A4S04600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30A4S04600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1031
Memory245.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 20:03
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 152
55% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 586
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,987
123% 1,987 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 178
Parallax 172
136% 172 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 167
Splatting 112
108% 135 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 121%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1649 1505 1513 1516 1531 1468 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1980
Write 1,757
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 1,530
383% 1,705 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 54.3
175% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 414
302% 395 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 245%
Great: 372%
Spcc Solid State 1TB
874GB free
Firmware: 3A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 80 17 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 458
Write 404
Mixed 329
SusWrite 96
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 15.2
70% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 78.5
DQ Write 25.1
DQ Mixed 23
24% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 95%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
511GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 874 873 856 848 848 844 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,113
Write 814
Mixed 894
SusWrite 857
206% 920 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 52.8
172% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 430
321% 428 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 170%
Great: 372%
Avago MR9364-8i 20TB
13.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.9% Poor
Read 436
Write 40.3
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 49.8
31% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
5% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
HPT DISK 0_0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2178 2165 2153 2159 2142 2144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung MZ7WD480 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 203Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 429 427 424 424 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 339
Write 430
Mixed 324
SusWrite 426
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 32.2
108% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 263
202% 276 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 94%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 36.9
Write 35.4
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 36.1
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.8
258% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix ... 255GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384, 16384, 16384, 32767, 16384, 32767, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.8% Good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A4S04600 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: Lenovo 30A4S04600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $1,542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback